When I first started looking into universities and careers, my mother advised me simply…
Go into accounting. Learn the language of business. Then no one can pull the wool over your eyes.
I had no idea how prescient that advice would be. But eventually, over a career that has lasted more than 25 years, I found out just how right she was.
But this widespread problem doesn’t have to threaten your investing portfolio. In fact, you can use it to your advantage…
Today, I’ll show you a better way to understand and value your investments.
I’ll even show you how it could help you make multiple times your money… right under the noses of Wall Street experts.
There is tremendous value in understanding a company’s true financial status.
Unfortunately, performance metrics like the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and discounted cash flow are terribly distorted and, in some cases, totally useless.
How could this be?
Without getting too technical, the problem lies with the standards of as-reported financial statements… specifically under GAAP (“Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”) and IFRS (“International Financial Reporting Standards”).
For instance, a firm may report increased earnings when, in fact, its performance has faltered. P/E ratios may show stocks are expensive when they’re actually cheap. Margins, assets, capital expenditures, debts, and virtually all key financial performance indicators can be a far cry from an accurate representation of corporate activity.
A simple example is the FIFO/LIFO accounting policy that management teams choose for reporting cost of goods sold and inventory levels…
It is perfectly acceptable for one company to use the LIFO (or Last-In-First-Out) method for reporting cost of goods sold. The company just assumes that the last goods added to inventory are the first ones to be sold. Meanwhile, a peer company could choose the FIFO (or First-In-First-Out) method… the reverse.
Both companies have chosen a perfectly legal and acceptable accounting method under GAAP. However, each of these firms now has incomparable profits, costs, and balance sheets. Many other key financial performance indicators will also fall victim to this simple change.
And that’s just one example. My team and I have identified more than 130 similar inconsistencies that can crop up in financial results.
Believe it or not, this isn’t about lying CEOs trying to “massage” their earnings. The problem is institutionalized…
The financial-reporting authorities have established a set of standards that have been argued, debated, and then cemented over decades and decades. Unfortunately, the result is a set of inconsistent accounting rules that reflect a mixture of different goals.
All this probably sounds daunting. If most financial statements are wildly inaccurate, how can everyday investors know anything?
You should be asking yourself a different question: How can you use this to your advantage?
These accounting problems mean valuing a company based on the available information can be misleading. In other words, Wall Street is getting it wrong!
The data they are using, the screeners they are using, the models… they’re all wrong. And that gives us an edge on Wall Street – and on most of the investing world.
In order to see the true picture, my team and I have come up with a solution. We comb through the financial statements of more than 8,000 publicly traded companies around the world. We take them apart… and then put them back together using globally consistent standards that repair these problems.
As an example, let’s look at streaming company Netflix (NFLX). Below, you’ll see the publicly reported “return on assets”… in other words, the cash return that Netflix makes based on each dollar it invests into its business.
This is what the world believes to be true about Netflix.
According to the reported numbers, even in the early years, Netflix’s return on assets was only about 1.8%. Not very impressive.
The real picture, though, is much different. We took another look at this company using our method (which we call “Uniform Accounting”).
The blue bars are our adjusted and REAL return on assets for Netflix, dating back to 2003. Take a look…
Return on assets was 36 TIMES higher in some cases. We arrived at these numbers by deconstructing and then rebuilding Netflix’s entire balance sheet… correcting all the built-in mistakes.
You could have bought the stock based on just this information as late as 2013, and still made 15 times your money.
Even as of last year, there’s still a major discrepancy in the reported return on assets. It’s almost nine times higher than what the public believes to be true.
This is the power of our Uniform Accounting metrics. We can sift through the results looking for great companies that are widely mispriced… and find chances to make multiple times our money.
These discrepancies are all over the stock market. All you have to do is look for them.
Regards,
Joel Litman
This Stock Could Go Up 66% or More [sponsor]Marc Chaikin built the system that isolated NVDA before it became the best-performing stock of 2023. Click here to get his latest buy. More here.
Source: Daily Wealth